bookz wrote:the forums are sloppy, the torrent comments are sloppy, and suggesting that it requires 500usd a month to run a site and a tracker like this is fraud.
i love the sentiment, but the execution is lacking.
I have to agree with this.. not sure where the claim about it requiring 500usd to run this place comes from, but I find the torrent interface on this site to be quite.. cumbersome, non-standard, and ugly. One has to wonder if the money this site generates is really going into improving this site.
For an example of a much cleaner, and more organic format, see the site
Son of Shun. It has a forum interface allowing people to upload torrents within the same interface, which allows people to comment on the torrents and have debates within the same thread of the torrent. This leads to more people participating in the forum. And the forums and interace are a lot less ugly than this site. The other benefit is that older torrents can be "bumped", making older torrent threads visible once again, so that reseed requests can be made and filled.. instead of what goes on here, which is that everybody leeches a torrent when it is uploaded and nobody bothers to keep it seeded or to reseed it. And duplicate torrents of the same program/documentary are added periodically when instead simply reseeding an older torrent, via the torrent/thread bump mechanism as in Son of Shun, would be preferrable as you don't have to split the swarm by creating a whole new torrent.
I really think that improving this site's interface and making the torrent section more organic with the forums, as is done at Son of Shun, will create a more community feeling and encourage people to start participating in the forums. The way things are currently with this site seems to serve a very narrow purpose, which is to get maximum Google hits...