Categories
Last 5 Donors
E M. | € 10 |
Melody B. | $ 10 |
Anonymous | $ 10 |
Christoph F. | $ 3 |
Andrew M. | $ 5 |
Syndication
Torrent Info
The Ascent of Money - S01E01 (17 November 2008)[WS PDTV(XviD)] avi
The Ascent of Money - S01E01
Channel 4 - 17 November 2008
1/6: Dreams of Avarice
In this extraordinarily prescient series, The Acent of Money, Professor Niall Ferguson shows how the history of money has been punctuated by gut-wrenching crises and crashes. From the origins of banks to the rise of 'Chimerica', each programme deals with a financial 'big bang' that has changed the course of history. He begins by examining the origins of banking and the innovative concepts of credit and debt which underpin the world economy and have driven progress for millennia.
Filename.........: The Ascent of Money - S01E01 (17 November 2008)[WS.PDTV(XviD)].avi
Filesize.....: 387,487,744 bytes
Runtime......: 47:44.440 (71611 frames)
Video Codec..: XviD ISO MPEG-4 (B-VOP//)
Video Bitrate: 946 kbps
Aspect Ratio.: 624x352 (1.773)
framerate....: 25.000 fps
Audio Codec..: 0x0055 MPEG-1 Layer 3
Audio Bitrate: 128kbps 2ch CBR 48000Hz
| 70e02880455b5f4d49227735c776e4ba912bda33 |
Tracker | http://onebigtorrent.org |
Category | Documentary |
Uploaded by | |
Uploaded on | Dec 11, 2008 |
Number of files | 1 |
Last Seeder | 7h 51m 2s ago |
| 3681 |
| 1385 |
| 784 |
8 Comments
Erm, this documentary treats "money" as a capitalist notion of money...
The introduction with the incas is utter nonsense from he point of view of economic theory.
This is as "unbiased" as BBC reporting on Iraq or Gaza...
The introduction with the incas is utter nonsense from he point of view of economic theory.
This is as "unbiased" as BBC reporting on Iraq or Gaza...
Jan 02 2009, 21:21 CET
I'm sorry but this is pure propaganda.
If this is truly an Anarchist dedicated site then, admins please remove this fascist propaganda filth and ban the upoloader.
Fuck BBC and fuck the fascist upper.
If this is truly an Anarchist dedicated site then, admins please remove this fascist propaganda filth and ban the upoloader.
Fuck BBC and fuck the fascist upper.
Jan 03 2009, 00:09 CET
Ban the up loader ? this is kinda harsh don't you think
I uploaded this for people with open minds nobody is forcing you to believe in anything .
You have a right to state your opinion that's for sure but don't tell people what to do or think my friend seams to me you are very in tolerant of others that might differ with you
I uploaded this for people with open minds nobody is forcing you to believe in anything .
You have a right to state your opinion that's for sure but don't tell people what to do or think my friend seams to me you are very in tolerant of others that might differ with you
Jan 03 2009, 18:30 CET
No, it's not harsh, cretin.
Banning pedophile movies is harsh on the pedophiels, isn't it? So why ban it?
You fascist fuck? I am intolerant? How about the british FILTH in this movies that just MAKES UP HISTORY?
What's that, cretinous fuck? How can people "make up their mind" when the FACTS presented are FALSE?
Why the fuck did we kill the nazis? Why the fuck weren't you tolerant to their "different opinion" on the jews? How far does "let people go with their different opinion" go, retard?
That's why retards like you elected Bush the second time? Because they (Bush & co) were entitled to their own opinions? And you "respect" that?
Standing here, of all places, on an ANARCHIST oriented site and defending that fascist captialist propaganda crap, filled with outright lies, distortions and omissions, proves you are a nazi filth here to pump up the "different" opinion.
And I'm not your friend, filth! Go spread your fascist propaganda on p0rn and Desperate House Wifes Episodes trackers.
Banning pedophile movies is harsh on the pedophiels, isn't it? So why ban it?
You fascist fuck? I am intolerant? How about the british FILTH in this movies that just MAKES UP HISTORY?
What's that, cretinous fuck? How can people "make up their mind" when the FACTS presented are FALSE?
Why the fuck did we kill the nazis? Why the fuck weren't you tolerant to their "different opinion" on the jews? How far does "let people go with their different opinion" go, retard?
That's why retards like you elected Bush the second time? Because they (Bush & co) were entitled to their own opinions? And you "respect" that?
Standing here, of all places, on an ANARCHIST oriented site and defending that fascist captialist propaganda crap, filled with outright lies, distortions and omissions, proves you are a nazi filth here to pump up the "different" opinion.
And I'm not your friend, filth! Go spread your fascist propaganda on p0rn and Desperate House Wifes Episodes trackers.
Jan 03 2009, 20:05 CET
I agree with Farraday. I haven't seen this and don't plan to. Niall Ferguson is a twat of the first order. He's a known apologist for British imperialism, and one of the biggest cheerleaders for American-style blitzkriegs on the Arab world after 9/11.
Jan 05 2009, 08:34 CET
He might be an apologist but still presents a interesting point of view im not saying he is right or wrong
Why don't you just post something that you believe is with your point of view and let me look at it instead of calling people names
Oh buy the way i never voted for bush i knew he was bad news when he ran the first time around and i could not figure out what the Right wingers saw in him . It must have bean the attitude of keeping the Jews safe at all cost , that is what got him elected
Why don't you just post something that you believe is with your point of view and let me look at it instead of calling people names
Oh buy the way i never voted for bush i knew he was bad news when he ran the first time around and i could not figure out what the Right wingers saw in him . It must have bean the attitude of keeping the Jews safe at all cost , that is what got him elected
Jan 06 2009, 19:29 CET
Wow, cncfarraday is sore!! bit of a poor existence, a sorry life maybe. it seems you farraday can bag opinions and points of view, add the occasional profanity but contribute absolutely nothing to support your argument - what a scholar, your mother would be proud???. I think the BBC does a excellent job and supports journalism/documentaries worthy of screening. Do you think you can do a better job, well I don't think you can do much at all. Going by your opening lines above, anything you produce would be tossed out as incoherent nonsense. Perhaps you should just stick your head back into the sand.
Jun 06 2009, 16:21 CEST
Your Comment
Get E-mail notification about new comments. (LOG IN first)