Torrent InfoAspartame - Sweet Misery, A Poisoned World avi 2004
0 Seeds
1 Leechers695.11 MB
Report Abuse/Infringement
Aspartame - Sweet Misery, A Poisoned World avi 2004
Filesize.....: 695.11MB
Runtime......: 01:29:54
Video Codec..: XviD
"Sweet Misery" reveals one of the most pervasive, insidious forms of corporate negligence in the
The toxic long-term effects of aspartame are often dismissed as a"hoax" by the sweetener industry and at least five other internetwebsites. The real footwork, however, unravels something lesscomforting than a mere "Hoax."
"Aspartame is inherently, markedly and uniquely unstable in aqueousmedia" is a quote from the congressional record in 1985, and yet it was approved for use in soft drinks and other beverages.
So what happened?
Is there credible evidence if you look beyond the smokescreen of corporate medicine? The primary research and interviews have been quitedisturbing.
Dr. Woodrow C. Monte wrote: "Methanol [one of the breakdown products of aspartame] has no therapeutic properties and is considered only as atoxicant. The ingestion of two teaspoons is considered lethal in humans" (Monte, Woodrow, "Aspartame: Methanol and the Public Health",Journal of Applied Nutrition, Vol. 36, Number 1, 1984, p. 44).
Though it can hardly be considered good fortune to have an immediatereaction to aspartame, at least you are spared the potential long-term ticking time-bomb of a large array of neurological illnesses. These include, but are not limited to Brain Cancer, Lou Gehrig's Disease,Graves Disease, Chronic Fatigue, MS and Epilepsy.
In 1981 Donald Rumsfeld was CEO of Searle, makers of Aspartame.
8 Comments
I hate to take the side of corporate America, but there really seems to be very little scientific substance to these claims.
And even if there were, considering all the crap most of us eat, getting cancer from artificial sweetener is way, way down on the list of things most people should be worried about..
Apr 05 2009, 14:21 CEST
Not so sure myself. The pernicious problem is that it is quickly becoming impossible to get independent scientific investigation. Academia is really just a branch plant for corporate research and there is zero chance of funding. Of course, regulatory agencies are part of scam because they politically control who gets appointed to these bodies
Apr 05 2009, 15:32 CEST
Corporate funding in medical research is a big problem, but for Aspartame the case really seems to be very weak (and the high publicity of the 'controversy' largely stems from the success of a set of chain e-mails in the 90ies). I have to admit though that I haven't looked into it too closely.
Things like the consumption of animal products (and High-Fructose Corn syrup) are a far bigger problem I believe. It's perfectly uncontroversial that these things enormously harmful for public health and the environment, and absolutely nothing is done about it. Reminds me of a thing Bill Maher said on Politically Incorrect once (this was when The X-Files was still on): "The truth is not out there - it's right here."

Apr 05 2009, 16:38 CEST
I was a 4* chef for 14 years - a vegetarian for 9.
I don't care what others choose to put in their bodies. Keep your sweeteners, keep your MSG, I'll go direct to source thankyou very much.
The real problem as it seems to me is that mass (factory)farming, be it animal or vegetable, is environmental pollution.
Give me sugar anyday.
Thanks for the up.
Apr 05 2009, 17:05 CEST
@Martin do you drink diet coke?
Apr 05 2009, 22:54 CEST
No, can't remember when I had the last one. But I just checked and my vitamin supplements contain a sweetener (cyclamate) that's been banned in the US since 1970 ..
Apr 05 2009, 23:33 CEST
I think pollution (the toxin torrents recently) and the man-made discount sweeteners, or the man made 'eat more/buy more' sweetners that cause cancer etc, is really a good time to reflect of the role of externalities in lightly regulated capitalism. Namely, the true cost is borne by the irrational and uninformed for the profit of the informed and more rational. It's a predatory game, one might say savage.
Apr 06 2009, 00:05 CEST
thanks
Apr 06 2009, 00:09 CEST
Your Comment