User Menu

Torrent Index Upload

 


User Name

Password

Remember

Register
Lost your password?

CategoriesDocumentaryNews & Current AffairseBooks, Magazines, Audio Books
ChomskyTalks, Debates, InterviewsMisc
Last 5 Donors

Jean-Marc A.

$ 20

Loic J.

$ 3

Paul M.

$ 5

Anonymous

$ 10

michael T.

$ 5

Donate!
SyndicationRSS
HTML

Valid HTML 4.01 Transitional

Valid HTML 4.01 Transitional

Torrent Info

A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon

Seeds2 Seeds Leechers0 Leechers
103.80 MB

Sibrel believes that there were numerous insurmountable scientific and technical problems which made it improbable that men could land on the moon and return to Earth safely. Further, he believes that certain anomalies and inconsistencies in NASA's records of the landings point to a hoax, and that the space race was actually a race to develop armaments, citing a 95 percent similarity between the technologies that allowed the launch of intercontinental ballistic missiles and the launch of the Saturn V rockets.

Bart Sibrel claims that NASA perpetrated a fraud, because of the perception that if the United States could put a man on the moon before the Soviet Union did it would be a major victory in the Cold War, since the Soviets had been the first to achieve a successful space launch (Sputnik in 1957), the first manned space flight (Vostok 1 in 1961), and the first spacewalk (Voskhod 2 in 1965).

Bart Sibrel also claims that the life-threatening events that occurred during the Apollo 13 mission were actually manufactured by the government to force people to pay attention to the space program. He suggests that this is proven by the claim that a number of viewers called the television networks complaining that coverage of the second lunar mission, Apollo 12, was interrupting repeats of the I Love Lucy program, saying: "it became clear that for the taxpayers, once was enough".

The 47-minute documentary primarily focuses on the Van Allen belts, areas of intense radiation circling the Earth, as a major reason why Sibrel believes it was impossible for a manned spacecraft to land on the moon. Bart Sibrel also presents what he claims is official NASA footage, shot over the course of three days, that was not meant for public release. In this footage, the crew of Apollo 11: Neil Armstrong, Michael Collins and Edwin "Buzz" Aldrin are, according to Sibrel, staging part of their mission to make it appear that they were 130,000 miles from Earth. The illusion was allegedly perpetrated thus: a color camera was placed at the rear of the capsule, anything that could produce light was deactivated, and an insert was placed on the window to create a false terminator. Sibrel's allegation here is that it took three days for the astronauts to perfect their filming techniques rather than travel to the moon. Moreover, he contends that there is "Earthshine" clearly visible in the window after the lights were turned back on and that this proves that Apollo 11 was in low Earth orbit.

A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon also examines the still photographs and points out what it claims are anomalies, such as non-parallel shadows, to support the assertion that multiple artificial lighting sources were used; sped-up video footage of the astronauts walking on the lunar surface and lunar rovers driving on the surface are also used to advance the theory they were actually filmed on Earth and slowed down to simulate the moon's lower gravity. The lack of visible stars is another point stressed by Bart Sibrel.

A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon was narrated by a British stage actress named Anne Tonelson. Bart Sibrel himself makes no appearance in the film. He does appear prominently in the similarly-toned Fox Television Network special, Conspiracy Theory: Did We Land on the Moon?

Bart Sibrel also alleges that the "Star Wars" Strategic Defense Initiative was far simpler than the government claimed it was, and that tests were artificially manipulated to, according to the Government Accountability Office, fool the Soviets about U.S. military readiness.

[edit] Criticisms

Jim McDade, writing in the Birmingham News, characterized A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon as "full of falsehoods, innuendo, strident accusations, half-truths, flawed logic and premature conclusions."[1] According to McDade, the "only thing new and weird" in the 47-minute film is that the claim that video views of Earth were actually filmed through a small hole to give the impression that Apollo 11 was not in low earth orbit.[1] "Bart has misinterpreted things that are immediately obvious to anyone who has extensively read Apollo history and documentation or anyone who has ever been inside an Apollo Command Module or accurate mockup," says McDade.[1]

Sibrel has also gained some national exposure as an alleged astronaut stalker.[2] One infamous incident was with Buzz Aldrin. Sibrel asked Aldrin to put his hand on a Bible and swear that he walked on the moon and when Aldrin refused, Sibrel called Aldrin a coward, liar and thief. This led to an angry Aldrin punching Sibrel in his face.



Info Hash

2b7667160a14b254e27f3d7220d6e1c987d3ff2d


Tracker

http://onebigtorrent.org


Category

Documentary

Uploaded by

redjack992

Uploaded on

Jun 11, 2009

Number of files

1

Last Seeder

50m 31s ago


Seen

3064

Downloaded

547

Completed

244


13 Comments


I think this is an important piece to see. Saw it a number of years ago. Plus the size looks pretty small and easy to get.

Conspiracy nuts love to say, "Yep, I _knew_ it" and jump at everything that moves.

But this gives some real questions. And if you accept the answers, you feel like the Maytag man-- the loneliest in town.

Smile
Jun 11 2009, 23:44 CEST
dono if this is the one I saw a long time ago but to be honest I don't believe it. I've never seen any compelling evidence that a moon landing fake happened. Wouldn't we hear of Russian reports about the radiation in outer space? And how come it isn't reflected by the large magnetic field that encompases the body of both the earth and the moon and the space directly in between, coincidentally the place where people have transversed?
Jun 12 2009, 05:07 CEST
Correct if I'm wrong but have there ever been Russian moon landings?

Telemetry is an issue. I cannot recall who monitors what out in space or if the Van Allen Belts give interference. Surely there was communication out into space. The only issue I could see is that Russian equipment is on the opposite side of the planet and so would not be able to pick anything up.


The film dissects a number of these things-- not just moon walks. I made a disc of it last time on the torrents.
Jun 12 2009, 05:37 CEST
thanks
Jun 12 2009, 12:13 CEST
Good grief. Nobody with a brain can seriously give consideration to this nonsense. All of the "arguments" purporting to cast doubt on moon landings have been thoroughly addressed. For a comprehensive list of sources, see:

http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/misc/apollohoax.html
Jun 12 2009, 15:16 CEST
Good deal, oleo_glggm. If some some proof is out there for things like the flag waving as if it's in a breeze exists then great.

This film purports to have unreleased footage of things with audio that supports the theory.

Now, back in the hey day of the Soviet Union when everyone wanted to stake out the moon for development why did the Soviets never attempt the same thing?
Jun 12 2009, 16:25 CEST
Update: the badly designed bad astronomy website was unreadable. Any place that has "basically" in the first sentence I dismiss out of hand.


Please join my campaign to eliminate the tedious use of the word 'basically.'

Here is the reasoning:

The word "basically" is an overused verbal tic which demeans and condescends to the listener. It is at the same time a way for the speaker to inflate his own self esteem by flogging and repeating words that appear to emphasize personal knowledge.

It is a fault which has become, I fear, some sort of custom or accepted colloquialism of the meritocracy.

Are there any that use correct and non offensive English?
Jun 12 2009, 16:34 CEST
I'm sorry, loninappleton, that you're unable to separate information and its presentation.
Jun 12 2009, 16:55 CEST
I went through an astronaut ice cream phase once. Couldn't get enough of it. For those of you in distant lands, astronaut ice cream is freeze dried ice cream for kids.

Anyways one day a package of the astronaut ice cream included a pamphlet from nasa. The formating, diction, logos, and copyright all indicated that this stuff had been on the shelf for a while, since the early 80's.

The pamphlet was all about the lunar landing and geared towards children. Easy words, lots of pictures, etc. BUT here's the thing, in about the third paragraph, the author breaks into this elaborate, jarring, and not-so-subtle, highly defensive explanation about how, (speaking to children):

"Some people say the moon landings were faked. These people are stupid and do not know what they are talking about. Smart people know that there were photos ... and bad people say not"

Well, I don't know what the exact quote was, but someone at NASA was being very defensive. Clearly they were trying to turn ice cream loving children into reactionaries.
Jun 12 2009, 19:24 CEST
Correct me if I'm wrong but didn't we learn things from going to the moon, like for instance that it had a small core and was likely developed from a collision with earth about 400m years ago or something to that effect? I've heard some of the information about the moon as accredited to the Apollo program and the moon landings as well. I don't think that this is an elaborate hoax and in fact I can say that a likely reason for the USSR's collapse was that they wasted productivity on useless weapons (useless to stop the social change that collapsed their society) rather than exorbitant scientific endeavors that paid off in the end for the american economy.

It is hard for one such as myself coming from a scientific background to take people seriously who espouse this kind of nonsense. It reminds me of the same type of drivel I hear from creationists or anti-doing-something-about-global-warming types. I scoff at your foolishness and fling used petri dishes in your general direction.
Jun 14 2009, 22:45 CEST
Yup, and the U.S. govt. blew up the W.T.C.,
...and the Hollocaust was faked,
...and Sadam had WMDs,
...aliens built the pyramids too,
...and when you die you'll go to a wonderful place called heaven, where there are angels with real wings, and you can have ice-cream for dinner every day.
Jun 16 2009, 22:36 CEST
simple test for apollo believers:

look at actual NASA footage of the alleged filming of "1/2 way to the moon" and the "earth shot" in the background. snapshot it and look at the earth they are allegedly showing, specifically the cloud cover during this hoax. There never has and never will be clouds running from north/south or east/west when they "turn" the earth view. If you even have Dish Network go to the "earth" channel and look at it; as many times as you want, but you will never see a continuous band of clouds running the full face of the earth from the top to the bottom or from side to side.
Nov 15 2009, 03:14 CET
terbates,


This is still going as a discussion. I would like to see these photos and then pick up the discussion.

Anything that goes half way to the moon, according to the film, would be wiped out by Van Allen Belt radiation. Even if they didn't get killed going or coming through this, the other point made is that any photographic film would be nixed.

Would that not warrant a test flight with the space dog?

FYI on OBT someplace there is an interview session with Rummy and bunch of other administration players during the period. The interview is recent.

Moon enthusiasts should view the film Moon (2009). It is an homage to Moon travel in a good science fiction story.
Nov 15 2009, 04:08 CET
Your Comment


E-mail me about reactions to my comment.

(Please LOG IN first.)

Get E-mail notification about new comments. (LOG IN first)