The Money Masters
Report Abuse/Infringement 1 Seeds 0 Leechers1.37 GB
THE MONEY MASTERS is a 3 1/2 hour non-fiction, historical documentary that traces the origins of the political power structure that rules our nation and the world today. The modern political power structure has its roots in the hidden manipulation and accumulation of gold and other forms of money. The development of fractional reserve banking practices in the 17th century brought to a cunning sophistication the secret techniques initially used by goldsmiths fraudulently to accumulate wealth.
With the formation of the privately-owned Bank of England in 1694, the yoke of economic slavery to a privately-owned "central" bank was first forced upon the backs of an entire nation, not removed but only made heavier with the passing of the three centuries to our day. Nation after nation, including America, has fallen prey to this cabal of international central bankers.
The success of the central banking scheme developed into a far-reaching plan described by President Clinton's mentor, Georgetown Professor Carroll Quigley, "to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent meetings and conferences. The apex of the system was to be the Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the world's central banks which were themselves private corporations. Each central bank....sought to dominate its government by its ability to control Treasury loans, to manipulate foreign exchanges, to influence the levels of economic activity in the country, and to influence cooperative politicians by subsequent economic rewards in the business world."
Several short-lived attempts to impose the central banking scheme on the United States were defeated by the patriotic efforts of Presidents Madison, Jefferson, Jackson, Van Buren and Lincoln. But with the passage of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, America was firmly lashed to the same yoke, so that a small number of very rich men have been able to lay upon the masses a yoke little better than slavery itself. That yoke inevitably grows heavier with ever-compounding interest, and totals over $20 trillion of debt owed by the American people today ($80,000 per American) ultimately to these bankers.
This vast accumulation of wealth concentrates immense power and despotic economic domination in the hands of the few central bankers "who are able to govern credit and its allotment, for this reason supplying, so to speak, the life-blood to the entire economic body, and grasping, as it were, in their hands the very soul of the economy so that no one dare breathe against their will." A worldwide tyranny is gradually being imposed, hidden to most, by THE MONEY MASTERS.
Sounds great, but who produced it? Do they have any credibility?
Aug 09 2010, 16:41 UTC
it appears to come from this website...
the usual crypto-jew thesis with Ron Paul offered as the answer.
Aug 09 2010, 16:46 UTC
Lol, just kidding. Thanks
redjade, by jew, you mean zionist, right?
Aug 09 2010, 20:48 UTC
"by jew, you mean zionist, right?"
No, Jew, because I don't think there were Zionists in the 18th century. But besides that Rothschilds keep cropping up over and over again as the people to blame, the larger issue for me is as follows:
I'm ready to believe that there may be a cabal of super-rich bad guys who run things from behind the screen, but I also want to go after the large corporations and other rich people and interests that are apparent to anyone who pays attention -- the big banks, the pharmaceutical companies, the agribusiness giants, the war profiteering industries and all the politicians (especially Republicans but not limited to them) who let them have their way. Arguments like in The Money Masters seem to be willing to forget about those guys as small fish who don't really matter in wanting to concentrate on the uber-bankers in the shadows, and I think at best that's a mistake and at worst may be purposely mis-directing.
Aug 10 2010, 07:15 UTC
Hi Phredo "Erikkk Cartman"
I'm about as Jewish as a black lesbian hollywood actress whose been on such hits as Star Trek TNG, and the film Ghost, and who dated Ted Dansen, is a co-host on the View.
Aug 10 2010, 19:48 UTC
Hi Erikkk -
"I'm about as Jewish as..."
I think maybe you misunderstood me. By saying, "No, Jew," I wasn't addressing you. I was commenting on your saying that your remark, "you mean zionist?" was not a very meaningful way of talking about the somewhat anti-Jewish tone in some parts of "The Money Masters", because the Jews it talks about were before Zionism was a going concern, so it really couldn't be called "anti-Zionist."
By the way, despite my comments that arguments about "money masters" sometimes seems to obscure the real problems of the captitalist scum we see every day screwing up the world, I still think the idea that the Federal Reserve is a scam that makes taxpayers pay interest on what should be our own money is pretty interesting. I wish more "mainstream" economists would talk about it or I could find out in some other way whether it is true or not. Economics is so complicated!
Aug 10 2010, 20:39 UTC
I passed on this when I also found the same web site and the pictures of Ron Paul. I think Milton Friedman was also pictured.
Want to see capitalists running amok and screwing up the world? Look no farther than the HBO documentary "Gasland," which is also seeding on this tracker. Cheney and his cabal of oil company execs wrote legislation, and the Republican-controlled Congress passed it, which gave oil and gas companies exemption from the Clean Water Act of the 1970's. Even NIXON knew better - he established the EPA! Look how far we've come... down hill.
Aug 11 2010, 16:06 UTC
1. The second version/sequel, "The Secret of Oz" is lacking the heavy emphasis on the Rothschilds, and, in my opionion, is better done and more interesting. http://tracker.concen.org/torrents-details.php?id=18037 and http://tracker.concen.org/torrents-details.php?id=15795
2. Ron Paul and Milton Friedman aside: what I find interesting is the following. These films, and other people, assert that the Federal Reserve charges taxpayers, in the form of interest, for creating our money, which they "loan" to the government in the form of bonds. I admit I have a very shaky understanding of the process and really need to rely on "experts" to verify this idea. But, as the story goes, the Government need not have the Fed create our money and instead could create it itself, interest free. These films say that there has been a long fight in the US, dating back to pre-1776, over whether our money should be controlled by a (private) "central bank" or the government itself, that Andrew Jackson and Lincoln, just for two, fought strongly against the "central bank" concept, and that the creation of the Federal Reserve represents the final (unless it is changed in the future) triumph of the Central Bankers.
To reiterate: the contention is that the creation of money by the Federal Reserve creates a huge ongoing transfer of wealth from taxpayers to private bankers. Also, the interest repayments on the national debt, which require the creation of more money, is a huge cause of inflation. I would love to find out more about the truth of these ideas from sources I trust.
Aug 11 2010, 18:35 UTC